CfP: "Maps and visualisations. Modelling functional networks in usage-based approaches to language"
Stadt: Osnabrück
Frist: 2026-01-15
Beginn: 2026-08-26
Ende: 2026-08-29
URL: https://societaslinguistica.eu/sle2026/first-call-for-papers/
Workshop Proposal
59th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea (SLE)
Universität Osnabrück, Germany
26.-29. August 2026
Maps and visualisations. Modelling functional networks in usage-based approaches to language
Workshop conveners
- Oliver Ehmer, Osnabrück University, oliver.ehmer@uni-osnabrueck.de
- Katharina König, Münster University, katharina.koenig@uni-muenster.de
- Jörg Zinken, Leibniz-Institute for the German Language, zinken@ids-mannheim.de
Keywords
- semantic maps
- polysemy and functional networks
- qualitative and quantitative analysis
- language change and grammaticisation
- interaction and interactional linguistics
Semantic maps have been around for over 40 years (Anderson, 1982) and have proved to be a useful tool for understanding similarities and differences in the pairing of forms and functions across languages, typological trends, and pathways of language change (Haspelmath, 1997; Georgakopoulos/Polis, 2018; Narrog/van der Auwera 2011). During that period, other methods for exploring and visualising complex relationships of meanings in language and across languages have entered the picture, often involving statistical methods – such as multi-dimensional scaling (Croft 2022, Croft/Poole 2008; van der Kli/Tellings 2022; Wälchli/Cysouw 2012) or network and cluster analyses (Lanwer 2020) – in order to reflect the quantitative distribution of the association of forms with selected functions.
This workshop provides a dedicated arena for taking stock of such methodological advances and discussing ways forward in the use of (various kinds of) semantic maps for exploring and visualising functional networks. The focus will be on approaches to the study of language that prioritise language use in their theorising, such as interactional or usage-based approaches to language, cognition and change.
These approaches have accumulated rich bodies of empirical descriptions of language structures and practices. Their empirical descriptions come with challenges and potentials that make a mapping of semantic concepts or discursive functions attractive (Zinken/Küttner 2022). (1) Within a field, semantic maps can play a role similar to that of meta-analyses in the social sciences, making it possible to assess convergences across accumulated studies; (2) across fields, semantic maps can enhance the accessibility of analyses, and work as a meta-language (or even work as a “nonverbal tool for describing and comparing meaning”, Wälchli/Cysouw 2012: 679) bringing together different descriptive endeavours in our relatively fragmented and terminologically heterogeneous/diverse field; (3) regarding semantic change, they can help to explore complex pathways in diachrony instead of assuming a purely linear progression; (4) last but not least, the rich and detailed analyses provided by descriptive linguists can become an asset for the very methodology of semantic maps, for example, by providing converging or corrective evidence on the nodes of a map.
To date, lots of questions remain open in the process of realising the analytic potential of semantic maps and visualizations for usage-based approaches to language. These include (1) a better understanding of the relative use of ‚implicational‘ or ‘probabilistic’ semantic maps and other quantitative data explorations and visualisations; (2) the viability of maps for studies including relatively small sample sizes and/or numbers of languages, as is usually the case in detailed descriptive work; (3) adapting mapping procedures, for example, the discovery of nodes, to the strengths and difficulties of usage-based approaches. To this end, the workshop provides a forum for discussing these and other methodological challenges and sharing work that attempts to bring maps and other visualisations to bear on usage data.
We welcome submissions that
- offer a methodological reflection of the potentials and challenges that arise in visualising functional networks as they emerge from qualitative and/or quantitative data-driven analyses of usage data;
- employ a range of methodological and theoretical frameworks, including but not limited to Interactional Linguistics, Construction Grammar, usage-based linguistics, grammaticalisation and semantic change, linguistic/pragmatic typology.
We are particularly interested in studies that
- cross-connect their findings and reflections to different fields of linguistics, emphasising the potential role of semantic maps for connecting different subdisciplines;
- reflect on the epistemological potential for both, ‘implicational’ and ‘probabilistic’ forms of mapping and visualising functional networks.
Roadmap
- 06.11.2025 feedback if you are interested in joining the workshop
- 17.11.2025 send a short abstract of max. 300 words (including examples but excluding references) to one of the workshop organizers
- 20.11.2025 submission of workshop proposal by us
- 15.12.2025 notification of acceptance/rejection of workshop
- 15.01.2026 deadline for submitting a full abstract of your workshop contributions via EasyChair, see the SLE webpage for more details (note that first authors * have to be SLE members, annual fee of approx. 30€)
- 31.03.2026 notification of acceptance/rejection of abstracts
Conference webpage
https://societaslinguistica.eu/sle2026/first-call-for-papers/
References
Croft, William. 2022. On two mathematical representations for “semantic maps”. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 41(1). 67–87.
Croft, William/Poole, Keith T. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34(1). 1–37.
Georgakopoulos, Thanasis/Polis, Stéphane. 2018. The semantic map model: State of the art and future avenues for linguistic research. Language and Linguistics Compass 12(2). Article e12270.
Haspelmath, Martin. 1997. Indefinite Pronouns. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lanwer, Jens P. 2020. Appositive Syntax oder appositive Prosodie? In Wolfgang Imo & Jens Lanwer (eds.), Prosodie und Konstruktionsgrammatik, 233–281. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Narrog, Heiko/van der Auwera, Johan . 2011. Grammaticalization and semantic maps. In Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, 318–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van der Klis, Martijn/Tellings, Jos. 2022. Generating semantic maps through multidimensional scaling: linguistic applications and theory. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 18(3). 627–665.
Wälchli, Bernhard/Cysouw, Michael. 2012. Lexical typology through similarity semantics: Toward a semantic map of motion verbs. Linguistics 50(3). 671–710.
Zinken, Jörg/Küttner, Uwe-A. 2022. Offering an interpretation of prior talk in everyday interaction: A semantic map approach. Discourse Processes 59(4). 1–28.
Beitrag von: Oliver Ehmer
Redaktion: Robert Hesselbach